Tuesday, March 31, 2009

And they say Crime Doesn’t Pay

One of the Blogs I read regularly is one called Evolving Excellence. The March 31, 2009 posting summarizes some thoughts I have concerning our financial situation. I pasted it below for you to see. One of the thoughts I had yesterday while reflecting on the GM CEO sacking was how similar it is to the actions the CIA took in the 1960's and earlier with foreign governments. If our government didn't like the leader of another country, we set about to have a coup and "bam" they were gone or dead. About the only nice thing about the past weekend's maneuvering is Mr. Wagoner only lost his job.


Posted: 30 Mar 2009 03:24 PM PDT


Bank of America got $25 billion last Fall, then another $20 billion in January, plus a guarantee against losses of $118 billion, and now the New York Times is reporting that the bank also grabbed another $5.2 billion unbeknownst to the rest of us through an outfit called American International Group. By my arithmetic, that comes to a shade over $168 billion of our cash the bankers needed to cover their screw-up.

Part of the bailout money went to cover the $20 billion+ losses of Merrill Lynch, which the B of A bought knowing full well that Merrill Lynch had lost all that money. It also went to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses to thousands of Merrill Lynch employees right before the deal closed.  The B of A then covered the bonuses with the first bailout check, and is now dragging their feet as the New York State Attorney is demanding the details.

The boss at the Bank of America - a good old boy named Ken Lewis - not only stays out of federal prison, he keeps his $10 million a year job.  Note: In fairness to Mr. Lewis, he demonstrated great personal sacrifice by settling for $10 million in 2008 while the bank was in D.C. with its grubby hands out.  The previous year he took home $20 million.

Contrast that sad story with GM.  They get $9.4 billion - 95% less than the shifty banker got.  And now for reasons Mr. Obama has yet to explain, if GM wants another dime, the big boss has got to go. Rick Wagoner is fired.

As readers of Evolving Excellence well know, I am hardly a member of the Rick Wagoner fan club, but no one has ever breathed an insinuation that he is sneaky, devious or in any way dishonest - like the bankers and brokers with their bonus shenanigans.  No State's Attorney's Office has reason to investigate Wagoner, or his management of General Motors  

What are we to think of this other than to draw the obvious conclusion:  The folks in the financial community can play as fast and loose with ethics, the law and other people's money as they want without consequences? Manufacturers, on the other hand, can't even fail, let alone wallow in the self-serving ethical sewer the bankers and brokers inhabit, without losing their jobs.

What's up with that???

There might have been some logic behind it had Obama demanded that GM put a manufacturing pro in charge like Alan Mulally at Ford where a bailout wasn't needed, but no.  Wagoner is being replaced by Fred Henderson - another in a long line of career GM accounting and finance guys a whole lot like Wagoner.  So what's the deal?

We are told we have to follow through on bonuses to sleazy bankers and Wall Street shysters or else they won't be able to attract the best talent.  But throw the manufacturing bum out on his ear - after all, anybody can run factories ... is that it Barack?  Screw the manufacturers and fawn over the bankers and brokers? 

Why didn't UAW President Ron Gettlefinger get canned part of the mandate? Didn't the union have an awful lot to do with the mess at GM? Or maybe canning Wagoner is Obama's way of helping his union backers by giving GM management a hearty head slap. 

Whatever this deal, it is, like just about everything Obama has touched in his first few months on the job, it stinks. Bankers and union bosses sail through the economic mess unscathed, while manufacturing management and manufacturing workers get the shaft.

Most laughable is that the auto industry crisis is largely the result of bankers so fouling things up that no one can get a car loan.  If the Bank of America had found their way clear to make just a little bit of the $168 billion available for people to buy Chevys, maybe GM wouldn't be in such dire straits.  Just a billion or two of it would have helped, but no, that hasn't happened. 

You blew it Rick.  You have acted honorably, and naively thought you were dealing with honorable people. Shoulda paid yourself a whopping bonus out of the $9.6 billion instead.


Doc said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Doc said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Doc said...

apologies for the off-topic comment, but did you happen to notice rowena plett's atrazine column in the record/star-j/gazette-j?

i find it interesting because of a slightly similar article i found while looking for other information.

the "result" link appears to have been written for a Madison County newspaper two years before the "Baron & Budd Prevails in Case Against Manufacturers of Atrazine" story that shows up at the top of the "search" link.

NOTE: had some trouble getting the format right on the links, but these should work right.

--Andrew Ottoson